Headlines

In The Time of Amrapali

Posted by Celebrate Life Style information Blog | Sunday, 19 October 2014 | Posted in

Legend—much of it based on references in Buddhist texts—has it that in about the 6th century BC, in the city of Vaishali was born the girl who grew up to be the courtesan, Amrapali. She eventually left a life of power and influence to become a Buddhist arahant, ‘one who is worthy’. A fascinating life, and one that has been celebrated even in popular culture.

Anurag Anand’s Birth of the Bastard Prince: The Legend of Amrapali is the second in his series of books about Amrapali (the first was The Legend of Amrapali). While it draws from fact—Amrapali’s love affair with Bimbisara, the king of Magadh; the war between Magadh and Vaishali; and Amrapali’s renunciation of the world in favour of the life of a Buddhist arahant—the book is a work of fiction.
It begins with an introduction which summarises the first book: the story of how Amrapali, abandoned in a mango grove and brought up by foster parents, grew up to be the nagarvadhu (‘the bride of the city’, a euphemism for ‘official’ courtesan) of Vaishali. This section serves also to provide a glimpse of Amrapali’s character: a beautiful and accomplished dancer, an attractive woman—yet also canny, intelligent, and strong-willed.

Hardly surprising, then, that when the book begins, we find Amrapali pretty much holding centre stage in Vaishali: her fortnightly dance for the public draws crowds from across the city; her intelligence saves—literally—the life of a young man in trouble with a mean Raja; and she is, to much of Vaishali, not just the nagarvadhu, but a woman of substance and power. It is her fame that draws to her a mysterious trader named Bindusen, with whom a few fleeting encounters (before he vanishes inexplicably) leave Amrapali pregnant.

Simultaneously, Vaishali finds itself in danger. Magadh, ruled by Bimbisara and with its newly anointed crown prince Ajatshatru fresh from a victory, is looking to conquer Vaishali. There are those within Vaishali who will sell her; there are those in Magadh who will try to stop Bimbisara and Ajatshatru from succeeding.

Birth of the Bastard Prince paints a large and interesting canvas, ranging all the way from the political intrigue and military strategy governing two kingdoms at war, to the everyday emotions of men and women. Love, passion, lust, affection. Ambition, treachery, disaffection. Revenge. All of these, and more, play their part in the lives of the characters in this book, as they set about trying to get what they want—or, at times, trying to prevent what they want from drifting away.

What makes Anand’s book interesting is the story, and the pace of it. Birth of the Bastard Prince moves swiftly yet believably from one perspective to the next, binding together battlefield and home, Magadh and Vaishali, love and hatred.

Sadly, what lets the book down is the language, which is tedious, heavy with adjectives, and downright baffling at times (“The milky candescence of the moon mingled with the golden glint of fiery torches that lined the boundary walls and lent an exultant tactility to the surroundings”). Much of the book reads as if the author inserted words from a thesaurus with little knowledge of how they’re used: guilt and curiosity, for instance, are assuaged, but so are lives. Very contemporary words and terms—deliverables, collateral damage, baby bump —jar, and there are proofing errors by the dozen (embers, for example, is consistently misspelled as ambers, and hordes is often written as hoards). The few anachronisms (mentions of tea and potatoes, for example) are, by contrast, minor.

What Birth of the Bastard Prince needed were a ruthless editor and a competent proof reader. The story itself is good, the plot interesting and the characters intriguing. When the language, though, is the way it is, reading this book can be laborious. - The New Indian Express.

The Position of Women in Buddhism

Posted by Celebrate Life Style information Blog | Friday, 12 September 2014 | Posted in

Today, when the role of Women in Society is an issue of worldwide interest it is opportune that we should pause to look at it from a Buddhist perspective. In the recent past, a number of books have been written on the changing status of women in Hindu and Islamic societies, but with regard to women in Buddhism, ever since the distinguished Pali scholar, Miss I.B. Horner, wrote her book on Women under Primitive Buddhism, as far back as 1930, very little interest has been taken in the subject.

It seems, therefore, justified to raise again the question whether the position of women in Buddhist societies were better than that in non-Buddhist societies of Asia. We will look briefly into the position in Sri Lanka, Thailand, Burma and Tibet, at a time before the impact of the West was ever felt. See at more: http://nirvanapeace.com/english/buddhism-philosophy/buddhist-philosophy/172#.VBL6mWPdtio

Position of Women at the Time of the Buddha

Posted by Celebrate Life Style information Blog | Saturday, 6 September 2014 | Posted in

In ancient India the position of women does not appear to have been a very happy one. Generally women seem to have been looked upon as being inferior to men. And, at times they were considered as being on the same level as the Sudras, the lowest of the four castes. Their freedom was extremely limited. The general view appears to be that they had to be under the care of parents in their childhood, under the protection of husbands in their youth; and in their old age they had to be under the control of their sons. Therefore, it was thought that they do not deserve any freedom. Their main role was considered to be that of housewives, managing the affairs in the house according to the wishes of their husbands.

Even as a wife the life of a woman was often miserable. This was specially so when she had the misfortune of being a co-wife. Jealousies and conflicts between co-wives were a common feature in ancient Indian society. The widow's plight was still worse. Normally, a widow was not allowed to remarry. It is said that a widow had to kill herself by jumping into the funeral pyre of her husband.

Women did not have educational freedom. Education was not considered as being of any importance to women. Their religious freedom, too, was restricted. As they had only little freedom, their chances of performing meritorious religious rites, too, were very limited.

Generally a woman was considered a burden on the family because the males had to bear the responsibility of looking after her. Besides, she was incapable of performing religious rites for the well-being of the departed parents, and therefore, she was considered as being of little use. This is why the birth of a female child was considered as a sign of misfortune in a family. Parents prayed for the birth of sons, both to carry on the family name and traditions and also to perform the necessary religious rites for their benefit when they are dead and gone. How miserable the father felt at the birth of a daughter is seen from the event connected with King Pasenadi of Kosala. When this King was informed that his queen gave birth to a daughter he came to the Buddha and lamented. The Buddha had to pacify him saying that good daughters are as good as good sons.

Buddhism does not consider women as being inferior to men. Buddhism, while accepting the biological and physical differences between the two sexes, does consider men and women to be equally useful to the society. The Buddha emphasises the fruitful role the women can play and should play as a wife, a good mother in making the family life a success. In the family both husbands and wives are expected to share equal responsibility and discharge their duties with equal dedication. The husband is admonished to consider the wife a friend, a companion, a partner. In family affairs the wife was expected to be a substitute for the husband when the husband happened to be indisposed. In fact, a wife was expected even to acquaint herself with the trade, business or industries in which the husband engaged, so that she would be in a position to manage his affairs in his absence. This shows that in the Buddhist society the wife occupied an equal position with the husband.

The Buddha's advice to the King Pasenadi of Kosala, who was a close devotee of his, clearly shows that Buddhism does not consider the birth of a daughter as a cause for worry and despair.

Buddhism does not restrict either the educational opportunities of women or their religious freedom. The Buddha unhesitatingly accepted that women are capable of realizing the Truth, just as men are. This is why he permitted the admission of women into the Order, though he was not in favour of it at the beginning because he thought their admission would create problems in the Sasana. Once women proved their capability of managing their affairs in the Order, the Buddha recognised their abilities and talents, and gave them responsible positions in the Bhikkhuni Sangha. The Buddhist texts record of eminent saintly Bhikkhunis, who were very learned and who were experts in preaching the Dhamma. Dhammadinna was one such Bhikkhuni, Khema and Uppalavanna are two others.

The Theri-gatha contains numerous stanzas that clearly express the feelings of joy experienced by saintly bhikkhunis at their ability to enter the Order and realize the Truth.

Most Popular Posts

E Paper for Buddhist News and Articles